
8-Day
Week
A weekly e-newsletter from the publisher of Chronogram containing:
Up-to-date Mid-Hudson events, listings, selections of insight
for conscious living, and social & political commentary.
|
|
|
|
Community
Notebook > Opinion
Catskill Renovations
BY Tree McElhinney . Photos by Dion Ogust

Greene County rresident Bruce LaPierre has been hiking
and biking the Blackhead Range in Windham for years. When not on foot,
he pedals his mountain bike through his neighbor’s backyard, entering
the forest preserve by way of a trailhead located less than 500 feet from
his home. Several times a week during the summer, he can be found on the
trails covering anywhere from 10 to 20 miles at a time.
Ulster County biking enthusiast Ray Grehl, who grew up in the Catskills,
follows a similar routine. “I meet a couple of guys after work and
we’ll ride 12 to 15 miles on various trails. A good Sunday ride,
though, will take me over 20,” says Grehl, who is the president
of Fats in the Cats, a Kingston-based mountain biking club that was established
in the early ‘90s when off-road biking first began to take shape
as a popular outdoor activity on the East Coast.
As part of the mountain biking community, the two men represent a growing
recreational constituency in the Catskills that, along with several local
and state lawmakers, small business owners, and other outdoor groups,
is opposing the draft revision of the Catskill Park State Land Master
Plan released by the state Department of Environmental Conservation in
August.
“While the DEC generally does an excellent job managing the forest
preserve, some of the changes proposed by this plan are not in the best
interests of the people of this region,” said state Senators John
J. Bonacic and James L. Seward in a joint statement in November.
Specifically, the Senators expressed opposition to proposed limits on
mountain biking and the number of people camping in wilderness areas,
while calling on the DEC to recognize that “while the Catskill Park
is inherently about preservation,” impeding tourism, “whether
it be mountain biking or camping,” would “not be good for
the economy of this region.”
“I’ve been up here in Greene County 11 years trying to promote
this region as a mountain biking destination,” says Nick Bove, owner
of Windham Mountain Oufitter and three other bike stores. “This
would be a tremendous step backwards for tourism, and it’s not just
about bicycle shops. The people renting the bikes are the people that
are staying at the inns and eating at the local restaurants. If we don’t
give them a good reason to vacation in the Catskills, we are going to
lose them. It’s that simple.”
To date, the Coalition of Watershed Towns, the Greene, Orange, and Ulster
County legislatures, and the towns of Hunter, Hurley, Warwarsing, Ashland,
Saugerties, Windham, and Tannersville have passed resolutions advocating
similar stands, in some cases singling out scout troops and other youth
organizations as those who would fare worst under the plan.
According to the draft proposal, the amount of land
designated as wilderness—the most restrictive of the DEC’s
land classifications—would increase by 54 percent within the 292,000-acre
Catskill Forest Preserve. To accomplish this, nearly 50,000 acres currently
designated as wild forest would be reclassified as wilderness, resulting
in the creation of the Windham Blackhead Range Wilderness area and the
expansion of the existing West Kill Wilderness area to include most of
Hunter Mountain Wild Forest.
While the current plan has no restrictions on bicycles, the new Master
Plan would prohibit their use in wilderness areas that would now comprise
92,300 acres, or approximately 35 percent of the preserve. In addition,
bicycle use would be limited to designated trails in wild forest areas.
Other restrictions include prohibiting the creation of new snowmobile
trails over 3,100 feet and limiting camping groups in wilderness areas
to 12 people and in wild forest to 20.
“We are not a bunch of people who want to see the Catskill Park
trashed,” said LaPierre who is a member of the Catskill Park Trail
Coalition, a group of outdoor enthusiasts, business owners, and concerned
citizens who recently organized in opposition to the draft plan. “But
for the DEC to come and place restrictions with no real scientific evidence
of environmental damage or reported incidents of user conflicts is troubling.”
State Assemblyman Daniel L. Hooker, who organized a meeting last month
between Trail Coalition leaders and DEC Commissioner Erin Crotty agrees:
“In everything I have seen and read and been presented with, I have
yet to see any empirical evidence of either substantial erosion or any
erosion for that matter, and I have not seen any empirical data to suggest
that there are safety hazards when you commingle mountain bikes and hikers.”
Although Crotty did not “on the spot promise that [the DEC] would
not proceed with the draft plan,” Hooker said, “she did say
that we raised very good points and that it was necessary to gather more
input.”
According to DEC spokesperson Maureen Wren, the proposed revisions address
the “increased diversity in recreational land use” since the
plan was originally drafted in 1985. And although the DEC did not conduct
a formal study of its impact, she said, “the prohibition of mountain
bikes in the wilderness areas of the Catskill Mountain preserve is consistent
with what the DEC already has in place in the Adirondacks and with federal
wilderness guidelines.”
Wilderness lands, Wren said, “are managed to provide a unique kind
of experience for the visitor, where one experiences the natural environment
without mechanical devices and their impacts changing that experience.”
Hiking groups such as the Adirondack Mountain Club[ADK] and the NY-NJ
Trail Conference, which maintains a good portion of the trails in the
Catskills, support the DEC’s efforts wholeheartedly, as demonstrated
by testimony posted on the Trail Conference’s Web site. “Over
the last few years, ADK and the Trail Conference have communicated to
the [DEC] our hopes and recommendations for a revised Master Plan that
addresses the future uses and protection needs of the Catskill Forest
Preserve,” writes Neil F. Woodworth, counsel for both organizations.
“Overall, [we] are very pleased with the draft revisions of the
Master Plan.”
The Catskill 3500 Club, which requires its members to climb all 35 peaks
in the Catskills over 3,500 feet, favors the DEC’s proposed to eliminate
biking in lands designated as wilderness. “We support the revisions
because right now the Catskill wilderness is the only wilderness area
in the United States that does not prohibit mountain bikes,” said
Howard Dash, the club’s conservation chairperson. “Recreational
opportunities have to be in the framework of what the wilderness will
support. The wilderness does not support mechanized vehicles.”
Dash said the club is not opposed to mountain biking in the forest preserve,
but believes that it is better for all parties concerned to designate
specific trails for specific uses. Although Dash concedes he has personally
“not seen very much bike use in the Catskills,” he maintains
that it is dangerous for bikers to share trails with hikers. “The
trails are constructed for foot traffic. Bikers should be given the opportunity
to use other trails that are created specifically for that purpose,”
he said.
But on the restrictions placed on camping groups in the wilderness, Dash
sides with Boy Scout troop leaders like Tom Lindveit of Troop 66 in West
Hurley who has said that limiting an overnight outing to 12 people complicates
the issue of adult supervision for a scout troop of 12 boys. “There
should be a special dispensation for groups like the Boy Scouts,”
said Dash, “because it is educational.”
Having closed the period for written comments in November, the DEC is
currently in the process of reviewing responses in conjunction with the
feedback obtained from four public hearings in September and various meetings
with local interest groups since then. Although Wren says the DEC will
“likely consider, or incorporate or evaluate comments when finalizing
the Master Plan for release some time next year,” those responsible
for its production must face the vexing issue of how to accommodate tourism
and the diversity of public land use without compromising the wild places
we love.
|
 |



|