To borrow from the theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, “not to speak is to speak”—a line that has been circulating with renewed urgency as the No Kings movement regathers for rallies on March 28. Across the Hudson Valley, from Kingston to Catskill to Newburgh, the sense is less about protest as choice than protest as obligation. In a political moment defined by escalating executive power—at home and abroad—people are showing up because silence no longer reads as neutrality. It reads as assent.
Across the Hudson Valley, the map of resistance looks almost as dense as a school districting plan: Greenville, Delhi, Monticello, Catskill, Athens, Hudson, Tannersville, Woodstock, Saugerties, Rhinebeck, Kingston, Ellenville, Amenia, Great Barrington, Poughkeepsie (twice), Newburgh, Gardiner, Monroe, Beacon, Goshen, Warwick. (Map of events here.) Not so much a single protest as a distributed network—small towns and small cities threading themselves into a national fabric of dissent.
“Our community is intentionally collaborating to push back against President Trump’s violent, authoritarian actions,” said Larry Cox of Hudson Valley Strong–Indivisible. “We’re bringing together local residents from all walks of life who share a simple message: We don’t do dictators or kings in America.”
That phrase—No Kings—has proven sticky because it names the underlying anxiety plainly. The protests are not just about one policy or one event. They are about a pattern: the expansion of executive power into something that feels less like governance and more like rule.
Since the first rallies, that pattern has only sharpened. Immigration enforcement has escalated into something more aggressive and more lethal, including incidents in which US citizens have been killed during ICE operations, fueling outrage and organizing energy. The administration’s foreign policy has taken on a similarly unilateral cast, from military engagement with Iran to saber-rattling proposals that read less like diplomacy than territorial fantasy—Greenland today, Cuba tomorrow.
The ouster of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela—whether framed as liberation or interference—slots neatly into that same worldview: a presidency that acts first, justifies later, and treats international norms as optional. At home, the use of federal force in American cities and the normalization of militarized spectacle have blurred the line between democracy and something more brittle.
It’s this accumulation—policy by policy, incident by incident—that has turned No Kings into something larger than a protest brand. Organizers describe it as a nonviolent mass movement, one that has already mobilized five million people in June 2025 and seven million in October, across thousands of events in all 50 states. The March 28 mobilization is expected to be bigger still, with more than 3,000 events planned nationwide.
The coalition behind it reflects that scale: ACLU, SEIU, MoveOn, Indivisible, National Nurses United, the Human Rights Campaign, and others—an alphabet soup of civil society organizations converging around a shared concern that the guardrails are loosening.
And yet, for all its national scope, the movement still resolves locally. It looks like a brass band on a Kingston side street. A handmade sign in Hudson. A cluster of neighbors in Ellenville who have never marched before. The strength of No Kings is not just in its numbers but in its distribution—the way it turns civic anxiety into civic presence, town by town.
If there is a throughline, it’s this: democracies don’t usually collapse all at once. They erode, normalize, acclimate. The answer, historically, has been less dramatic but more demanding—people showing up, repeatedly, insisting on limits and refusing to stay silent.
The River is an independent news outlet that produces in-depth, quality journalism and analysis about the Hudson Valley and Catskills regions. Learn more about our mission and ethics.
