News & Politics
The Nightmare of E-Voting: Will Your Vote Count in 2004?
With the spotlight on voting machines after the fiasco in Florida in 2000, terms like chads and electronic voting have become household words. As we close in on the November elections, however, the jury is still out on a new generation of voting technologies.
As the November election looms closer, it's pretty safe to say that this presidential election promises to be just as dramatic - if not more problematic - as the 2000 contest. In a post-9/11 nation, government security officials warn almost daily of possible Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks on or near the election. Such ominous allegations have almost silenced what was proving to be one of the hottest stories of Election 2004 - the security and competence of the direct recording electronic voting systems (DREs).
For the past year tales of lost votes and easily hacked voting systems burned their way across the mainstream media, onto the Internet in blogs and chat rooms. Nonprofit groups sprung up practically overnight to "watchdog" the DREs and the vendors that made them. The issue got so heated that on July 13, 2004, citizens in 19 states took to the steps of their state capitals demanding a voter-verified paper trail as a backup in case the computers failed.
The matter of using secure and reliable DREs in elections isn't a small one. After the Florida 2000 election, DREs exploded onto the national landscape. According to Roy G. Saltman, only 10 percent of voters used them. Today, the Brennan Center for Justice predicts approximately 30 percent of registered voters in nearly half the states are expected to use a DRE to cast their ballot.
What are the problems of the DREs and what made them so popular? What can be done to safeguard the November 2004 election? There are various solutions but perhaps the participation of the average American voter may be the best line of defense.
PROBLEMS VS. POPULARITY


Have something to say?
Login or register to leave a comment.